How a pheromone wards off acts of pedophilia in mice

800px-Knockout_Mice5006-300

Hmmm…are you legal? Evolution’s found a way for young mice to broadcast “NO”! Source: http://www.redorbit.com/ 

Adult male mice tend to be a pretty randy bunch – unchained by humanistic social norms, they freely express their sexuality, often mounting multiple newly introduced females in a day when given the chance. Nevertheless, most adult males seem to have a “legal-or-not” radar, and stay far, far away from prepubescent females.

Why?

Unlike humans who heavily rely on sight and speech, social interactions between mice are influenced by pheromones – chemicals secreted in bodily fluids that act on a special part of a neighbour’s olfactory (smelling) system called the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Pheromones play a huge role in social interactions in mice – they can enhance attraction to a mate, strengthen a female’s memory of her mate’s location, induce abortion of a newly planted embryo and drive maternal aggression. Male mice, for example, secrete a pheromone called ESP1 in their tears that increases a female’s receptivity to his sexual advances. Female mice when housed together prolong each other’s reproductive cycles, thus delaying the onset of the period in which they’re willing to mate (aka “in heat” or “estrus”).

Since pheromones are so crucial to sexual behaviour in mice, could it be that juvenile females simply lack the “sexy hormone” to attract adult males? Or on the contrary, could it be that the young maidens have a special pheromone to guard them against unwanted advances?

you_shall_not_pass_by_anna_yaina-d5oiuj8

Rules of attraction. Source: http://fc04.deviantart.net/

D.M. Ferrero et al. A juvenile mouse pheromone inhibits sexual behaviour through the vomeronasal system. Nature, doi:10.1038/nature12579, 2013.

Researchers used genetic methods to identify numerous protein pheromones in various tissues collected from mice of different ages and sex. One particular putative pheromone –dubbed ESP22- caught their eye.  As you can see below, the gene is highly expressed in tear-producing glands in mice during adolescence (roughly 2-3 weeks of age), but tanked once they came of age. Secreted by acrine cells, ESP22 was also abundant in young mice’s tears, which is a well-known carrier of many types of pheromones.

Screen Shot 2013-10-03 at 5.36.16 PM

To establish ESP22 as a functional chemosignal, researchers introduced the protein to neurons in the VNO (pheromone detection system) and used electrodes to monitor if they activated in response– they did! What’s more, by labeling for a protein that is only present shortly AFTER neuronal activation (and thus a sign of recent firing), researchers found that ESP22 also activated neurons in medial amygdala, an almond-shaped area deep in the brain. The medial amygdala is part of the limbic system that receives input from the VNO to heavily influence reproductive and emotional responses in mice.

All these data point to ESP22 as a pheromone involved in sexual behaviour – but WHAT exactly is it doing in teenager mice?

To tease out the answer, researchers simply eliminated the “receiver”: they introduced adolescent females to adult males with a genetic mutation that rendered their VNO pretty much useless. The results were striking: compared to wild-type mice, these males showed vigorous sexual behaviour toward young female mice, making their moves faster (middle graph below, grey-wild type, red-mutant), more frequently (left graph) and spent more time in the act (right graph). This wasn’t because VNO-mutants were hypersexual – when presented with an ADULT female their behaviour was similar to that of wild-type mice.

Screen Shot 2013-10-03 at 9.26.02 PM

Grey bar: wild-type adult males, red bar: VNO mutant males. Greys are A LOT friskier than reds!

These results suggest that ESP22 acts as a deterrent against sexual advances. To further confirm their finding, researchers identified two strains of mice that didn’t express the pheromone during their teenage years. Sure enough, without the suppressor, male mice showed drastically increased sexual behaviour towards these strains (grey bars below, red are normal controls), regardless of the young one’s sex. However, when researchers reintroduced the pheromone by painting a synthetic version onto the bodies of ESP22-lacking juvenile mice, the adults once again respectably kept their distance and drastically decreased total mounting attempts.

Screen Shot 2013-10-03 at 9.36.37 PM

Finally, when researchers camouflaged oestrus “in heat” ADULT female mice with the pheromone, males approached these willing partners less frequently, and when they did, hesitated for much longer before mounting.

This is a pretty unique finding – generally, pheromones evoke a response from a receiver; here ESP22 actively INHIBITS a behavioural outcome. It’s interesting that the pheromone is present in both sexes – while male-female mounting generally signals reproduction, male-male mounting is more of a struggle for social dominance – hence mounting itself is not inherently always a sexual act. So in a sense (purely speculating) perhaps ESP22 is signalling to societal members “I’m not yet ready for the playing field”, in the context of both sex and power?

Finally, is ESP22 the anti-jailbait for humans too? The answer is a definitive no. Contrary to what commercials tell you, whether pheromones play a role in our social behaviour is still a hotly-debated open question. Humans do not have a functional VNO, hence even if we were to receive pheromone signals, it would have to be through some yet undiscovered mechanism.

ResearchBlogging.org
Ferrero DM, Moeller LM, Osakada T, Horio N, Li Q, Roy DS, Cichy A, Spehr M, Touhara K, & Liberles SD (2013). A juvenile mouse pheromone inhibits sexual behaviour through the vomeronasal system. Nature PMID: 24089208

One neurotransmitter to rule sexual preference?

I was planning on taking a small break from blogging after the #CAN2013 shebang, but this study is just too sweet to pass on. Serotonin! Sexual preference! Lesbian mice! From my Alma Matar! Interested? Read on.

 

“Which way do you swing?” It’s such a simple, but loaded question. Social-economic issues aside, even the biological basis of sexual preference is hotly debated. Homosexual behavior isn’t limited to humans; it’s evolutionarily conserved in species as diverse as the lowly fruit fly to the mighty lion. Some argue that genes are involved, but so far the hunt for “gay genes” have only led to dead ends (and a lot of controversy!). Sex hormones are the next suspect, but they seem to only change sex drive, not so much preference.

Now this study suggests that the answer may be as simple as one SINGLE neurotransmitter: serotonin.

Zhang S et al. 2013. Serotonin signaling in the brain of adult female mice is required for sexual preference. PNAS Early Edition. doi:10.1073/pnas.1220712110

Screen Shot 2013-05-29 at 4.13.45 PM

First off, why serotonin? We know that serotonin is involved in sexual behaviour. SSRI antidepressants, like Celexa and Zoloft, work by increasing the amount of serotonin in the synapses. This relieves depressive symptoms, but has the unfortunate side effect of lowering libido. Many other studies converge to support the same simple conclusion: more serotonin=less sexual behaviour, less serotonin= more sexual behaviour.

But what about PREFERENCE? The same group published a highly controversial study a few years ago, in which they argued that abolishing serotonin in male mice wiped out their preference for females. These mice showed sexual interest in both males and females, and mounted both sexes equally when given the chance. It caused quite a stir back then, with many pointing out that their conclusions were premature. One major problem is that serotonin-lacking mice are much more likely to engage in sexual behavior. Hence, they might have just been so horny that they didn’t care to pick-and-choose, mounting everything within sight regardless of gender.

Now the authors are back with more data, tackling the question whether serotonin also controls sexual preference in female mice. They first worked with animals lacking a gene called Lmx1b, which is required to make serotonergic neurons in the brain (leaving peripheral serotonin intact). Like humans, mice have a stereotypical “mating dance”, where they display sexual interest by sniffing the head and genital areas of the other party.

Screen Shot 2013-05-29 at 4.32.07 PMWhen given the choice between a strange male and female, wild-type (+/+) females steadily approached male mice, spending MUCH more time sniffing his “erotic zones” than those of female mice (blue bar). Amazingly, females lacking both copies of Lmx1b REVERSED this behavior, showing much more interest in the female than male (red). On average, they sniffed female genitals for longer and often went back for more. Meanwhile, females with one functioning copy of Lmx1b (+/-) showed an intermediate behaviour (green). This is remarkably different from the previous study with serotonin-deficient male mice; they showed a lack of preference towards either sex, not a reversal of preference.

Of course, it takes two to tango, so researchers wondered if sexual choice might have been influenced by behaviours of the object of affection – the target mice. To rule this out, instead of using live animals, researchers presented Lmx1b lacking females with slides smeared with male and female genital secretions on each side. As before, Lmx1b females showed a clear preference for female odors. When given the choice between smells from an intact and a castrated male, unlike wild-type females, serotonin-lacking females didn’t seem to care one way or the other.

This interest in females translated into behavior. When given a receptive female, 68.4% of Lmx1b females sniffed and tried to mount the target (complete with NSFW grasping and pelvic thrusts), while only ~30% of wild-type mice showed the same behavior.

Screen Shot 2013-05-29 at 4.37.59 PMHowever, when given a male mouse, Lmx1b females behaved just like their wild-type littermates: very few tried to mount the male, instead showing typical female mating behaviour. That is, they ran away and fought the male at first, but subsequently became more receptive (playing hard to get?). These results show that wiping out serotonin didn’t indiscriminately increase female sex drive; it just enhanced sexual behaviour towards other females.

To further support their idea, researchers repeated these experiments on another serotonin-lacking mutant (Tph2 mice), as well as on wild-type mice chemically depleted of serotonin. Just like Lmx1b females, these mice also preferred female to male odors and mounted females more when one was available. When given the choice between bedding smeared with either female of male excretions, Tph2 lacking mice lingered on female bedding and avoided male bedding (red), while wild-type mice (bue) didn’t display any preference (the equivalent to smelling underwear…? Just putting it out there). Finally, researchers chemically boosted serotonin levels in Tph2 females by giving them an injection of the precursor 5-HTP. Remarkably, after this simple treatment, Tph2 females lost their love for female bedding, spending similar amounts of time on both (yellow).

Screen Shot 2013-05-29 at 5.01.54 PM

Bedding preference. Or lack-thereof.

Additional experiments showed that serotonin-depleted mice had no problems detecting odors and phermones, and that their sex hormone levels were no different than that of wild-type mice. Researchers hence concluded that serotonin, by acting in the brain, controls female sexual preference.

Overall, this paper builds on the group’s previous study, making a much stronger case for serotonin in controlling sexual preference. Hypersexuality can’t explain serotonin-depleted females’ reversal of partner choice. Neither can lack of smell, since these females can clearly discriminate between males and females. Unfortunately, the paper didn’t comment on the elephant in the room: serotonin affects MUCH more than just sexual behaviour; it also regulates everything from aggression to social interaction to mood and memory. I find it quite interesting that serotonin-lacking females didn’t approach males more, as they should be friendlier (and hornier) than wild-type females (although this is predicted based on studies with male mice, it’s possible serotonin doesn’t affect females the same way).

So how well does this translate into humans? We really don’t know. Although serotonin is evolutionarily conserved, it has different effects on different species, depending on the type, amount and distribution of its 14 (!!!) different receptors. Human sexual behavior is obviously much more complex than that of mice, often tinged with past experience and social pressure. We absolutely cannot make the claim that serotonin is THE agent inhibiting same-sex attraction in humans. Results presented in this paper are very intriguing, but making the leap from mice to men is premature.

Finally, just to make it crystal clear, this paper DOES NOT provide proof that human homosexuality “can be cured”. In fact, increasing evidence points to sexual preference as a continuum – something that is fluid, modulated by past relationships and current concepts, and maybe (just maybe) influenced by the level of serotonin in the brain.

ResearchBlogging.org
Zhang, S., Liu, Y., & Rao, Y. (2013). Serotonin signaling in the brain of adult female mice is required for sexual preference Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220712110

PS. Thanks for reading to the end. I have this nagging feeling that I missed something about the study (perhaps some element that the researchers didn’t control for? But then I’m not a fan of wiping out the entire CNS serotonin system). Let me know if you have any thoughts!